The diagram represents the development of lakeside from 2000 to 2009.
The rendered maps dekineat the information regarding the process which has been done in the lakeside over the period of 9 years.
Overall, it is crystal clear that the lakeside had been upgraded with distinct variations in addition to an industrial complex, a cinema, a car park, offices and univerdities.
Turning to the rest of details, it is apparent that in the initial year, a derelic warehouse was located which in 2009 had been converted into a spacious car park. Afterwards, noticeably, the cinema of lakeside, in 2009 was contructed by demolishing the art centre that could be seen in 2000.
Moreover, in 2000, lakeside had an industrial complex which had expanded its area to great extent as it also took the place of residential area in the east-south of map. Surprisingly, the residential area of north-west side and the school remained at the same place till 2009, where they used to be. Undoubtedly, the river of lakeside which crossed from north-east to south-west was witnessed to be shrinked in 2009 as compare to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- Local government are pushing companies to move from large cities to regional locations What are the benefits and drawbacks of this 73
- Some people believe that success in life depends upon hard work and determination while others believe that other factors like money and physical appearance are important Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- The diagram represents the development of lakeside from 2000 to 2009 78
- The diagram shows various stages of milk processing
- Many children nowadays are spending more and more time inside rather than outside Is this a positive or negative trend Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your knowledge or experience 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97714285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87505243963 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6883887878 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189618220409 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089617456303 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630248906013 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962170207357 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051864836093 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.