The bar chart shows the percentage of international students enrolled in British universities in two years, 1990 and 2014.
The given bar chart compares the admission status( in percentage) in 10 different British universities over a period of 6 years from 2009 to 2014.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the enrollment rate in all but one of the universities either increased or remained the same over the period as a whole.
To begin with, in the year 2009, the University of Brighton, with 12% of admissions, led the entire chart, followed next by Leeds, at 9%. Further, whilst the other universities like Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Bristol, and Cardiff managed a proportional range between 8% to 2%, with merely 1.5% of admissions, Huddersfield University observed the least rank.
Turning to 2014, although with significant growth, Brighton continued to be at the top position(up by 1%), on the contrary, Birmingham witnessed a dramatic jump to surpass Leeds by 2% more admissions, reaching 12% by the period end. Over time, whereas Liverpool leveled off at 8% of admissions, Manchester reached on par with Liverpool, at 8% each. Furthermore, Glasgow, Edinburgh, and Bristol acquired the same level(half of Birmingham's proportion) as against Huddersfield, who recorded just 3% more entries. By contrast, Cardiff observed a substantial plummet of nearly 5% entries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 10/30/2020 - 15:59 | pris | 72 | view |
| Sun, 10/18/2020 - 07:16 | jessie_12345 | 75 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 78
- The users of social media such as Facebook and Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, whereas, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44174757282 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16728508149 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665048543689 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7934417471 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.125 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164050474443 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720951981373 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976389314647 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126604008625 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111800746965 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, whereas, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44174757282 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16728508149 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665048543689 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7934417471 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.125 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164050474443 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720951981373 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976389314647 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126604008625 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111800746965 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.