Technology has made children less creative than in the past. Do you agree or disagree? Give specific examples.
Today's modern world is changing rapidly and we humans have to change along with it. The use of technology has changed our lives to a large extend that it becomes impossible to live without it. Although technology has lot of benefits, I strongly agree that technology has lead to children becoming less creative. I delve with opinion for many reasons whic I will illustrate in my following essay.
Firstly, internet is a sea of information. There is almost no information which is not available online. Techers have started referring to online articles instead of reading books to students. There are various sites on the internet which usually map out important passages, stories and characters which ultimately destroy the creative ability of a student, as he has all the information readily available. He / she tends not to understand the full passage and instead focus just what is mentioned on the website. My personal life experience is very compelling to this. My cousin who is currently 10 years old had to write a essay for class which needed some research and details to be found out. He came to me and asked me that can he find this information on the internet. I told him, you should go to library and search for the content, research this through newspapers where such article are sometimes printed. He just ignored everything and requested me to just search and check if anything is available on the internet. To my surprise, a detailed essay with complete evaluation details and other significant changes that needed to existing essay to be rewritten. He saw this and boom, copied everything.
Moreover during other activities, children avoid creative thinking and just ignore investing their time to sit down and think of certain things to solve or perform certain activities. For example playing games outdoors which were invented by children themselves in the past. You can say this creativity. But nowadays they just go online , check some sites and ultimately take the content which is published. Also the other forms of technology such as television, games tend to take away maximum time of a student and thus making them lazy. Instead of going on adventures which increases their creative thinking , rock climbing , playing sports which ultimately would have helped children to gain insights on the game and enhance their imagination power, children just in front of the tv. Before tv and computers, children used to play simple games which made use of their fantasies when building things also adding up to their invention power. Nowadays with television being in place how can children learn these kind of skills , is a question?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | snehal1890 | 80 | view |
- Technology has made children less creative than in the past Do you agree or disagree Give specific examples 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 70
- Professors should appear on TV which ultimately benefits their respective universities and the professors themselves Also this benefits the general public Read the passage and hear the audio and answer the question 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... is currently 10 years old had to write a essay for class which needed some resea...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...saw this and boom, copied everything. Moreover during other activities, childr...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... this and boom, copied everything. Moreover during other activities, children avoid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tivity. But nowadays they just go online , check some sites and ultimately take th...
^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ly take the content which is published. Also the other forms of technology such as t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... which increases their creative thinking , rock climbing , playing sports which ul...
^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... their creative thinking , rock climbing , playing sports which ultimately would h...
^^
Line 5, column 1009, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...n being in place how can children learn these kind of skills , is a question?
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1029, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... can children learn these kind of skills , is a question?
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03636363636 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66908592864 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586363636364 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9093594376 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126849155067 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326846500322 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524165725559 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862760928083 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493924364299 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.