More and more people are competing for a place to study in universities. Reasons? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It seems to be an increasing trend that fighting for higher education is fiercer than ever. And generally, education is the main driving force behind the development of a good economy so this is a good sign. I think that the main reason for this phenomenon is people are seeking for better education in order to have a better career.
In the past, highly educated was not the focus in people’s life when many jobs required little to none qualification, working-class who aimed for a considerate life usually contented with those hand-to-mouth jobs. But this is no longer the case. With the advancement of technology and science, high educated candidates potentially have a higher chance of better employment, thus more and more people are after studies in universities. As the result, with higher demands, places in universities and colleges become more competitive.
Another reason leading to this happening is that people are, on average, richer compared to 50 years ago. Since more people could afford the expensive university fee, they are naturally enrolled in it. For example, when my father was 18 years old, my grandparents were so poor that they couldn’t afford to let him study at the university, thus he had to find a job.
Needless to say, competing for university is a very positive trend. More people compete for university education leads to a more qualified workforce. University and higher education definitely are creating more scientists, economists, engineers that are building the world and helping it to become a better place.
In summary, competition, in any field, is a good sign that indicated the said field is developing well. Competition in education, more than any other field, is a welcome issue that any country is willing to have.
- Some people think that the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects to make progress Do you agree or disagree 87
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on sports Why Is it a positive or a negative development 78
- In some cities the government has tried to reduce traffic by a congestion tax during rush hours Is this positive or negative 73
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people But some people say that young people can also be a leader Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, for example, i think, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09278350515 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91105658175 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4354270885 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385807594973 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127705501132 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910475772512 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195141990916 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995113021067 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.