The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. Measured in tonnes.
The line graph offers insights into the changes in the exploitation levels of 3 distinct primary fuels namely Petroleum, Coal and Natural Gas in a European nation, recorded on a yearly basis from 1981 to 2000.
Most strikingly, although erratic, the figures for Petroleum and Natural Gas experienced increases, the opposite was true of that for Coal after a period surveyed.
It can be seen from the line graph that in 1981, the data for Coal originally stood at 80 tonnes, which was 2 times higher than that for Natural Gas. In the next 10 years, while the former fluctuated within a margin of 30 tonnes, the latter remained unchanged at 40 tonnes. After that, the figures for Coal overtook that for Natural Gas to become the second most produced fuels.
With regard to Petroleum, there was a remarkable growth from nearly 100 tonnes to 130 tonnes in the period from 1981 to 1983. Subsequently, the amount of fuel produced by Petroleum plateaued at 130 tonnes for 4 years before it plunged to under 100 tonnes in 1989. The remaining period witnessed this figure varying and reaching over 120 tonnes ultimately.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while, as to, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 206.0 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83769633508 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53130397116 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 290.88556701 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.5432247337 44.8134815571 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 76.5299724578 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 16.8248392259 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 4.34317383033 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17882369454 0.216113520407 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820902943585 0.0766984524023 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846518927862 0.0603063233224 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11525842844 0.12726935374 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956903169225 0.0580467560999 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 8.71597938144 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.