Do you agree or disagree with following statement? it is more important for government to spend money to improve internet access or improving public transportation?
By and large, it has been established beyond doubt, all around the world, the population are increasing so fast and along with such gigantic elevations, governments must conduct enormous endeavors to provide these requirements of increasing population. A controversial question which is raised here whether governments spend money to improve internet access or to modify public transportation? From my perspective, I definitely agree with the latter viewpoint, and in the following paragraph I will delve into the most outstanding point of views and reasons, justifying my perspective.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned here is that day by day, our Earth is more polluted by human's activities and measures and most of the animal and plant species are subjected to the extinction because of air and water pollutants which have been produce in a great many of manufactures to exploit oil, coal or even woods. As a result, in the long run, we, as individuals who live in earth, we, as well, are be jeopardized. Therefore, by improving the public transportation and decreasing in unleashing detrimental gases for instances CO2, SO2, etc., resulted in green gas effect and global warming, it will be a wise ling lasting solution to create more cleaner environment for ourselves and other creatures.
Furthermore, another significant reason is that investing money and improving public transportation like buses, trains, even subways will be a crucial point by which the public satisfaction will be culminated. Similarly, people in every society always are going to live properly, and in their opinion, they have given the responsibility to governments to administrate their problems and requirements. Therefore, people expect such dissatisfactions like getting stock in terrible traffics or even waiting long hours in the bus routes by spending expanses on public transportation will be solved efficiently. To illustrate, the result of a research project has been conducted in my university, demonstrated that about two thirds of the young people, aged 18-40 years, are not agree with our government’s policies about building new roads and using new buses and subways, and they have thought that such measures were not convincing enough, and there have been a lack of suitable and convenient vehicles because most of them are crowed and had not appropriate chairs and enough spaces, and then such circumstances made them angry and outrage.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that governments are the only correspondence in every society which must pay more attention to improve public transportation, otherwise, we will soon witness the adverse effects of global warming and extinctions of special species of animals and plants as well as the increasing rate of dissatisfaction among different social classes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-11 | yasy.j728@gmail.com | 90 | view |
- Now listen to part of a lecture on the topic you just read about Professor Many people think that if you want to go into business for yourself it s best to buy a franchise But recently a study looked closely at franchises and some of the findings call tha 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following sentences movie and television have more negative effects on young people 76
- The benefits claimed for electronic medical records are actually every uncertain First the costs savings are unlikely be as significant as the reading suggests For example there probably won t be any savings related to record storage You see doctors who a 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the opinions of celebrities such as famous celebrities or athletes are more important to young people than they are to older people 78
- ProfessorIt s perfectly possible that the nests found inside the fossilized trees were made by bees 200 million years ago The arguments used by the skeptics are not convincing First it s true we have no fossil remains of actual bees that date to 200 milli 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...als who live in earth, we, as well, are be jeopardized. Therefore, by improving th...
^^
Line 2, column 625, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...t and global warming, it will be a wise ling lasting solution to create more cleaner...
^^^^
Line 2, column 657, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
... a wise ling lasting solution to create more cleaner environment for ourselves and other cre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...young people, aged 18-40 years, are not agree with our government’s policies about bu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, third, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38616071429 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18327598146 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582589285714 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.1344086022 199% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.451639649 48.9658058833 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 219.363636364 100.406767564 218% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.7272727273 20.6045352989 198% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 5.45110844103 200% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23604261111 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091357142812 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933821025684 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139146622307 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567096239639 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.3 11.7677419355 206% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.1575268817 186% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.87 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.0537634409 179% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.