It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
For all human beings, identity is a complex and perplexing issue. Some argues that, to answer the question “Who am I?”, we have to identify with different social groups. While I agree that we need to participate in different social communities in order to construct our identities, interacting with our parents, partners and children in private relationships is also an essential aspect of our identities.
One important identity marker is our nationality or citizenship. Although our nationality was determined at the time we were born, we have to participate in a number of specific social activities in order to express our identities as a citizen of a particular nation. One obvious thing is to speak the national language shared by all the people from that nation. Through speaking the language fluently and write in that language competently we immediately identify ourselves with all the other fellow citizens of the nation. In addition, we also support the Constitution of our nation and participate in the democratic processes such as electing the president and the Congressmen. Such political acts we engaged in with other fellow citizens also define us as a member of the nation.
At institutional level, we also define ourselves through getting involved in activities as part of different communities. As university students, for example, we have to take courses at university level and complete assignments given by university professors. The educational experiences at college level help us develop skills that only university students would have the opportunities to learn, e.g. conducting original researches based on library materials and field works. Furthermore, we also specialise in specific disciplines, e.g. economics or electrical engineering. The methodologies and theories unique to a particular discipline also enable us to look at the world from a particular perspective and our training in our major fields defines who we are as a researcher.
Nevertheless, our identities are more complex than our memberships of different social groups. We also define ourselves through intimate and private relationships with our family members. When interacting with our parents, our partners and our children, we do not always follow any rules prescribed by any social groups and we do not need to perform in a way to meet the expectations of the larger community. In the private domains of family, we have more space to express ourselves liberally without worrying about being stigmatised by any social groups. The good time we spent with our families, the good food we shared and the emotional joy and pain we brought to one another all define who we are as private individuals. It is fortunate that despite the different roles we have to play in society, we can still enjoy and celebrate our true selves with our family members who are willing to accept who we are regardless of any social rules.
Overall speaking, it is reasonable to claim that we define ourselves primarily through participating in different communities or social groups while playing different roles following the prescribed rules. Nevertheless, we still have the opportunities to define ourselves through building satisfying relationships with our family members for whom we may enjoy the freedom to be whoever we want to be.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | zanzendegi | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | tomlee0205 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Jeyodi | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 77
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 55
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic problems here in Waymarsh are obviously reaching record levels While just three months ago it would take me 15 minutes to get to work it now takes closer to 25 Waymarsh should follow th 59
- People s behavior is largely determined by the forces not their own making 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an essential aspect of our identities. One important identity marker is our nat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so define us as a member of the nation. At institutional level, we also define o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 785, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lds defines who we are as a researcher. Nevertheless, our identities are more co...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 950, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we are regardless of any social rules. Overall speaking, it is reasonable to cl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., furthermore, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2808.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08938381484 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460227272727 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 906.3 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9693821984 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.636363636 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77272727273 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476823867059 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155765978945 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102633475496 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297156246014 0.150359130593 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121361941409 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.