Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have a different view about ways of studying. Although there are good arguments in favour of a lone study, I personally believe group studying is more efficient.
Alone studying is a suitable method for individuals who are self-directed and cannot match themselves with other people. Due to the diffrence between learning speed rate of learners, some students tend to study alone to make headway. in other words, they believe some people can take in more quickly and conveniently while other may need more time and effort. In this condition, this difference may cause desperation learner and plagues other members. in addition, they think alone studying brings them more freedom, which leads more control on student studying schedules. Take a student who is a night- person as an example. he is more likely to learn at nights however he is enforced to study during day in order to do not disturb other people.
On the other hand, I do believe group studying provide more opportunities for students to learn and solve problems and obscurity. Psychologies argue teamwork generally have a potent influence on people stimulation and determination. They think this studying method not only increases the effectiveness of member’s ingenuity but also engender and ideal condition in which people depict and make all their knowledge available to everyone and the ground is laid efficient learning so everyone can benefit from others knowledge.
Moreover, it is clear that learning needs a great tendency and desire. For example, a student may fail to understand and intake content or stick in a problem. In this circumstance, other group members highly motivate him and surge his inclination.
To some up, although some people choose to study alone, I think group studying is more effective ways in which the performance of group members can be enhanced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | kwchung | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
- Full time university students spend most of their time in class or working on assignments However some people think that it is important for students to get involved in non academic activities on campus as well for example to join a sports team or take pa 71
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to speed'
Suggestion: to speed
.... Due to the diffrence between learning speed rate of learners, some students tend to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ts tend to study alone to make headway. in other words, they believe some people c...
^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...tion learner and plagues other members. in addition, they think alone studying bri...
^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...t who is a night- person as an example. he is more likely to learn at nights howev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, i think, in addition, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21262458472 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78997380265 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7988150427 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429973953363 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130200137307 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923517022793 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229900061883 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843635756199 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.