Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been a considerable debate about the values of studying history. While some said it is useless, others and I believe it plays an important role in providing information for humans. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.
To commence with, it is understandable that some people think studying from the past is useless. The main reason is that we have more pressure in studying while we can not apply it in real life much. For instance, when students study history, they certainly have to memorise the date and place of events. Therefore, students are stressed to remember exactly the time of occurrences which is not really relevant to today’s life. So creating more pressure and inapplicability is the main reason that some consider history useless.
However, there are also many reasons why others and I believe history is a good source of information. First, history provides us exact information about national formation. As history allows us to access exact time and place of events, we can know how our ancestors had to fight to protect our countries. As a result, we will know our responsibility to protect the countries formed thousands of years ago. Second, history also helps us to have a deeper understanding of our cultures and traditional values. From history, we can also know more about the development of our countries; therefore, we have better knowledge of how our ancestors lived, how they celebrated events such as New Years. As a result, we will know how to remain and organize these events in today’s life. So providing exact information about national formation and cultures and traditional values are the main reasons why some and I think history is a useful source of information.
In a nutshell, while some people think learning from the past is useless, others and I believe it is a good source providing information because of reasons mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-18 | John Hason | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of people working different in sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- the charts give information about world forest and timber in different five regions 73
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today s life Others argue that history is a valuable source of information Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02194357367 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81222498898 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470219435737 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7445763786 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2352941176 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30074111197 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1019849364 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727868378553 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198748753389 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340094644115 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.