Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People possess different perspective while correcting others mistake. Some people may choose to correct them right way, others may be silent because they do not want to challenge other people. In my perspective, I prefer not to be silence and I would interrupt them or talk to them personally based on different circumstances.
First of all, it is benefial for both lecturers and listeners to learn the correct information right away in the classroom. To be more specific, if I aware of the presenters convey false information, I should correct them in case of the lecturers keep spreading false information and other listeners will get something wrong. For example, I once corrected my professor in his data structure course. At the beginning, I was struggle about whether I should interrupt him because it seems impolite to correct teachers in my culture. Surprisingly, my professor and my classmates thanked me because of my desicion to correct the teaching material. If I choose to be silent, the false information would keep spread out in all of the students of the professor.
Second, I would choose to talk to meeting leaders with polite way after the meeting is over, especially in the commercial and business meeting becase the meeting in commercial and business sometimes include complex business strategy. It is hard to tell that whether the meeting leaders choose to tell incorrect information or not. For instance, when I was an internship in a trading company, I joined the price negotiatin meeting with my manager. During the meeting, the customers would ask about the price we sold to other customers, because they want to ask for discount. My manager will choose to tell a lie because we should try to get more benefit from consumers. If I corrected my manager right away, I would interrupt his strategy. So I would talk to him after the meeting is over to make sure the information is intend to be incorrect or it is a strategy.
To sum up, I would never be silence if there is something incorrect. And I would interrupt them or talk to them personally based on different scenarios.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- The best test of an argument is the argument s ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 60
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 68
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 68
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...se information would keep spread out in all of the students of the professor. Second, I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 821, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'intended'.
Suggestion: intended
...is over to make sure the information is intend to be incorrect or it is a strategy. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91036414566 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87487767652 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453781512605 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3795315141 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3888888889 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200379873389 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664436856947 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605182224382 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108696714304 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709418033119 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.