Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Undoubtedly, governments have different issues to prioritize when it comes to disbursing budget. While it may differ for governments from country to country, I believe that public transportation expansion is an integral exception issue for all of them directly or indirectly. In what follows, I will delve into my reasons.
First, public transportation system and its effect on societies take such an essential attention when we think about environment protection, which is a very serious problem for all humans. Since all vehicles for transportation use different fossil fuels like oil, coal, or natural gases; they have a heavy carbon-footprint, which is the major reason of global warming. Consequently, our planet suffers from rising sea level, climate change and many natural disasters following the global warming. When we can ease these huge worries by decreasing the fossil fuel usage, it shows the importance of this critical issue. Governments must attempt to solve that by investing in using public transportations that uses clean energy such as electrical power or other renewable resources. As a result, people encourage to leave their private cars at home, when such an environment-friendly buses and trains are accessible and easy to use. In the end, all humans will have a suitable air to breathe and environment to live.
Second, allocating money to improve the public transportation is a superb way to spend money of taxpayers. Since most people, especially low-income ones, are in a desperate need of such help, authorities can disperse all common-wealth equally by providing population with a well-developed transportation system. To put this into more vivid perspective, some minority of people, such as disabled people who cannot use their own private cars, rely just on buses and trains to commute or travel. Of course, the decision makers in our countries must prioritize these folks. And improving the public transportations which support these minorities is one of the most principal responsibilities of those governors for people.
In conclusion, I believe that government should spend a wealth amount of money to improve public transportation systems. This is because we help to preserve and protect our planet by using less private cars when we have a wonderful busses and trains and because it results in an equal distribution of money and subsidiaries for all people especially who are needy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-11 | heman@saini | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | SKN | 76 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | bijan54 | 93 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | bijan54 | 83 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 60 | view |
- The United Kingdom sometimes referred to as Britain has a long and rich history of human settlement Traces of buildings tools and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years from the Stone Age through the Bronze Age the Iron Age the t 3
- Some teenagers take part in different kinds of activities such as musical classes sports classes and so on but others only focus on one activity which is important to them Which idea do you support 70
- The zebra mussel a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a seriou 73
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 80
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 5 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Undoubtedly, governments have different ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lows, I will delve into my reasons. First, public transportation system and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leaving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: leaving
...esources. As a result, people encourage to leave their private cars at home, when such a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to breathe and environment to live. Second, allocating money to improve the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'commuting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: commuting
...ate cars, rely just on buses and trains to commute or travel. Of course, the decision make...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties of those governors for people. In conclusion, I believe that government...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36910994764 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20643870102 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573298429319 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9223618685 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.647058824 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242575218321 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801059585126 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10451785888 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152163608434 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689230436285 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.