The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003-2012.
The provided line chart highlights information about the amount of crime which was seen in Manchester city centre over a ten-year period from 2003 to 2012.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that there was an upward trend in the number of car thefts, while that of burglaries and robberies reached a plateau. Also, it is noticeable that in 2003, the crime of burglary was the highest but at the end of the period, this figure was surpassed by the car theft.
Looking at the chart in detail, it can be seen that the burglary experienced a significant fall from 3500 to 1000 in the first six years. Then, there was a levelling off around 1500 in the rest of the period.
Noticeably, the trend of burglary between 2008 and 2012 was similar with that of car theft and robbery in the whole period. However, at the beginning, the crime of car went behind the burglary, it rose and became the most popular crime in 2012 with over 2500, while the robbery still remained stable at around 600.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54444444444 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32498506566 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6115469702 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191921634601 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906930740752 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929000696554 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13464662295 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101607088885 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.