Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A question has been raised regarding whether the verbal communication outweighs than non-verbal one or in contrast. It goes without saying that written documents play an essential part in some circumstances. However, by all accounts, the spoken communication draws a stronger influence on people’s perception than the written one.
The aspect to consider regarding the undeniable crucial advantage of written communication concerns about legal documents. It can not be denied that most documents are valid only when they are shown by paper with sign and seal such as contracts or custom documents. For instance, thanks to this, related parties of the Contract will be under apprehension that what are their rights and obligations in order to obey. If a party breaks the rule, they will be penalized based on terms of the document. As a consequence, these documents will insure companies against the unwelcome loss, which may happen in trading duration.
On the other hand, it has brought to my attention that speaking skills turns into more important and irreplaceable nowadays. It can be observed that expressing feelings via facial expression, gesture, or body language by verbal communication, speakers definitely attract more attention from listeners. As we can deduce from the United States Presidential Election, candidates have to give speeches in front of millions of Americans to picture the country's future once they win. Therefore, hardly do they succeed in the Election by showing documents only, but it comes down to how powerful and strong beliefs are built on their speeches. On that basis, whether we speak directly and persuasively, we can gain people trust without difficulty.
In conclusion, both communication methods, spoken or written, are influential and difficult to sustain. Thus, from my personal perspective, under different circumstances, we should implement the most efficient ones in order to succeed or win our needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 78
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 73
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45394736842 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03131737724 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651315789474 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6402283316 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182716662974 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592066071144 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740667459328 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109389839378 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628015699087 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.