the graph below shows the comparison of fish and some different meat in Europe country between 1979 to 2004
The line graph illustrates which person consumed the quantity of fish and different kind of meats in Europeans country between the period between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that the consumption of fish, beef and lamb have all decreased while the consultation of chicken has dramatically increased.
The consumption of chicken, which was 150 grams in 1979, increased steadily till 1999, after which it rose significantly and reached a peak of 250 grams by 2004. Looking at the detail, fish was the least consumed over the year observed and remained the lowest among other meat items.
In 1979 beef was the highly consumed meat with an average intake of 220 grammes per person per week. Thereafter, the beef consumption varied for the next 10 years before a steady drop in 2004. The similar trend was seen in the intake of lamb which was consumed 150 grammes by a person per week and reduced to half of that in the year 2004.
- In some countries foreign language is taught at primary school Do advantage overweight disadvantages 61
- in many parts of the world children and teenager are committing more crime 61
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantages of the development of society outweigh the advantages 61
- the graph below shows the comparison of fish and some different meat in Europe country between 1979 to 2004 73
- The charts shows the industry sectors contributors of economy in India and Turkey in 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... chicken has dramatically increased. the consumption of chicken, which was 150 g...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...d the lowest among other meat items. in 1979 beef was the highly consumed meat ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63402374563 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1101330128 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214556806514 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117565523913 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140258296033 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157686007898 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157057495381 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.