The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind if the meat in European countries between 1979and 2004.
The graph illustrates the change in the amount of beef, lamb and fish consumed in a particular European between 1970 and 2004.
First of all, In 1979 the fish consumed in 55 grams of a week. There was a disagreement in every year.Moreover, The use of the beef was a very high level in 1983 which was time to consume maximum grams in almost 240 grams in seven days. After that year there emulated was alleviating dramatically after 23 years it reached 110 gram in a week.
After all, European people also like to consume lamb and chicken. Let's talk about the consumption of 1979. The use of the lamb was 150 grams in a week and the chicken was slightly below the lamb in 1979. After ten years both are calculating the different way. Chicken emulates was augmenting dramatically. That time the lamp followed was everything significantly. After ten years that was below 80 grams in a week. And the chicken, on the other hand, was at the maximum point it was above 250 grams in a week.
Overall, the graph shows how the consumption of chicken is augmented dramatically while the popularity of the other food alleviated over the period.
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projection till 2050 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology 56
- With the rise in popularity of the internet newspapers will soon become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Some people argue that air travel should be restricted due to pollution and excessive fuel consumption To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United States Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967and 2007 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...the fish consumed in 55 grams of a week.There was a disagreement in every year.Moreov...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
....There was a disagreement in every year.Moreover, The use of the beef was a very high le...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...grams in almost 240 grams in seven days.After that year there emulated was alleviatin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ically after 23 years it reached at 110 gram in a week. After all, European peopl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lets
...e also like to consume lamb and chicken.Lets talk about the consumption of 1979.The ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e also like to consume lamb and chicken.Lets talk about the consumption of 1979.The ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...Lets talk about the consumption of 1979.The use of the lamb was 150 grams in a week...
^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...ken was slightly below the lamb in 1979.After ten years both are calculating the diff...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ken was slightly below the lamb in 1979.After ten years both are calculating the diff...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Chicken
... both are calculating the different way.Chicken emulates was augmenting dramatically.Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...en emulates was augmenting dramatically.That time the lamp followed was everything s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...p followed was everything significantly.After ten years that was below 80 grams in a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...p followed was everything significantly.After ten years that was below 80 grams in a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...years that was below 80 grams in a week.And the chicken on the other hand was at th...
^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Never
...the food items war changed dramatically.Never try to judge very kind people who are p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, after all, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70935960591 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00471613576 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541871921182 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.4926829268 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 147.735193844 43.030603864 343% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 239.0 112.824112599 212% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.75 22.9334400587 221% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.25 5.23603664747 349% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934613925159 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728403213005 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691763196864 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728403213005 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691763196864 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 13.2329268293 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.65 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 10.3012195122 198% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.93 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.9970731707 200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.