The graph shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph depicts information about changes in the amount of consumption and certain kinds of meat namely chicken, beef, and lamb consumed in a particular country of Europe from 1979 to 2004. The data is given in grams per person per week.
Overall, it can be manifested that the amount of fish and meat consumption fluted significantly during the given period while there is a dramatic gal in fish, lamb, been of chicken an upward trend in the last year of giving period.
First of all, 1979 the amount of fish consumed was the very low starting at just approximately 60 grams the figures for fish leveld off and experience a slight decrease at the end of the period the consumption of beef was the highest in 1979 which is around 220 grams. this is followed by a drastic fluction between 1979and 1989. beef consumption the saw a sharp downfall and through at around 1100 gram at the end of the given period
Second of all, chicken and lamb consumption was nearly the same in the starting year of it was about 150 grams in 1979. The amount of lamb consumed then dramatically dropped to just over 50 grams in 2004. In contrast, chicken consumption to around 250 grams in 2004 reached it is 57 peak in 2001.
- The chrt below shows the percentages of industry secrors contibution to the economy of india and turkey in 2000
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- An increasing number of people are now using dating sites to meet their better halves 61
- The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of year in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The diagram shows the process of making instant coffee 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...hest in 1979 which is around 220 grams. this is followed by a drastic fluction betwe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beef
... drastic fluction between 1979and 1989. beef consumption the saw a sharp downfall an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...arp downfall and through at around 1100 gram at the end of the given period Secon...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57534246575 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49991555496 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.971380608 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242818181164 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102105358568 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889616170895 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14954850554 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632614031723 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.