Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well.
There are tons of debates that which is the most effective way to be successful. Some people believe the stairway to success is the experience or previous knowledge whereas others consider that taking a venturesome approach leads them to achieve long-term goals. In my opinion, trying new things and taking risks will most likely lead to success. I will explore the reasons for my opinion i
n subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is associated with the fact that people who try new things they planned carefully considering all the aspects of their work. As they execute everything deliberately, the chances of their failure are greatly reduced. Although they encounter problems, yet their risk managing tactics provides them with a solution to their hardships. As a result, their efforts are most prosperous. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my brother’s example. Five years ago, he planned to build a new factory in our town. It was not quite feasible as he encountered many arduous circumstances from convincing authorities to a selection of the right location to finance management, but he stayed firm to his plan and overcame all the difficulties one by one. His intensive planning and risk-taking decision resulted in a new factory in my town. Had he not planned everything diligently, would not our town have established the factory?
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that risk-takers think out of the box that results in discovery of new inventions that serve humanity. They become an example for the world, and people want to follow in their footsteps. To come up with innovative ideas, and to put forth them in front of others indeed only those can do, who are certain about their success. We are already well familiar with the work of all the scientists and researchers who are risk-takers, and their discoveries make the world wonders about them. Medical advancement, agricultural breakthrough, and technological developments are all work done by pioneers who took risks and open the door for humankind.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that successful people are those who take chances because they not only come up with carefully developed planing, but they also revolutionized the world with many discoveries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-27 | minammah | 71 | view |
| 2021-08-07 | avestaper | 76 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | zahrash75588 | 76 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | zahrash75588 | 83 | view |
| 2021-04-14 | Mithun Chandra Banik | 85 | view |
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 80
- working as team versus working alone 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 73
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- which will be the best tourist attraction indoor museum historical museum or shopping mall 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...paragraphs. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is associated with the fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...rth them in front of others indeed only those can do, who are certain about their success...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...k of all the scientists and researchers who are risk-takers, and their discoveries make...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, whereas, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12886597938 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95038596472 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2921227352 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.736842105 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213996109681 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602331052838 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589866253555 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105358116496 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574543544846 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.