The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan
The chart illustrates the proportion of holiday makers exploring four places of interest in Brighton over the 30-year period from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clearly noticed that from 1985, Pavilion has taken the place of Art Gallery to be the most preferred sight by visitors, with a peak in 1995, whereas Art Gallery has seduced a falling number of tourists. Besides, the percentage of people admiring Pier and Festival from 1980 to 2010 also changed but slightly.
Considering firstly Pavilion, from 1980 to 1995, people sightseeing this landmark had remarkably grown and the figure reached the cap of nearly 50 percent in 1995 to be the most visited attraction that year. However, the trend dropped sharply until 2020 then the slope slowed down to achieve 30% in 2010, but Pavilion was always at the 1st place among the four.
On the other hand, after the peak in 1985, the number of people visiting Art Gallery decreased continually, first quite dramatically then gradually from 1990 to 2010 and this sight was the least visited in 2010. With regards to Festival and Pier, the trend of tourists to the former fluctuated between 20% and 30% during 30 years and in 2010 it took the 2nd place among the four attractions; whereas from 1990 the latter appealed a rising number of people which helped it to land at 3rd place in 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 11
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78787878788 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41200529271 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5670995671 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8836254357 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0600123042334 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321825046927 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0158315656038 0.0843802449381 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0411591809843 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145775624734 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.