The table below gives information about values of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012. (Unit: NZ$)
The given chart compares the amounts of money from exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to Japan, China, Mexico, Russia and Saudi Arabia over a period of 3 years, beginning in 2010.
It is clear that the value of imports to Japan was highest among six countries during this period while the opposite was true for Russia. In addition, meanwhile the figures for Japan, China, Mexico and Russia experienced a significant increase, Saudi Arabia had the opposite trend.
In 2010, Japan and China were the top importing countries of kiwi fruit from New Zealand, considerably more than in the other sources, with 271 million and 74,9 million $. The figure for Mexico and Russia, however, were only about a two hundred of the figure for Japan and a seventy that China.
Over the following two years, Japan and China were remained in the highest position in importing value among five countries. In spite of occupying the small proportions, the importing money from Mexico and Russia increased double, soared to 3 and 2.4 million respectively. However, a downward trend was seen in Saudi Arabia over this period, decreasing from 29 million in 2010 to under 1 million in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-15 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | TLan168 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | TLan168 | view | |
| 2021-01-10 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 89
- The charts below show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 years who took part in organised cultural activities and sport in Australia in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevan 84
- The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside What extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92424242424 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45160218508 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4862758939 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18374971899 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862232707067 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077770428142 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130485440444 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709656692457 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.