The table below gives details of world electricity production by renewable sources in the four years between 2009 and 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The specific data of the worldwide electricity production from the renewable sources are illustrated in the table, covering the period from 2009 to 2012. The sources are divided into six different groups namely, geothermal, wind, solar, hydraulic and, biomass and, the numbers in the table expressed by trillion watt hours (TWh).
Overall, data is proving that hydraulic electricity production is still considered as the highest usage and, on the other hand, the lowest usage thorough four years has changed. Nevertheless, usage of all groups renewable sources are inclined by a distinct amount with each passing year. For instance, geothermal usage was 67.4 in 2009 and reached 70.4 in 2012 with a slight increase. This trend has repeated in Bio-mass and Hydraulic energy sources.
Furthermore, solar energy was in the bottom of the list in 2009 but, in 2012, the consumption has surpassed geothermal sources and rose almost five times within the period (21TWh to 70.4TWh). Striking increase was not only detected in solar energy but also, the wind energy source production has nearly doubled in 2012 (534 TWh) compared with 2009’s usage (276.4TWh).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-21 | tamir052222 | 78 | view |
- Chaco building usage 73
- The table below gives information about a bakery s average sales in three different branches in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 79
- The graph compares the percentage of international and the percentages of international students gaining a second class degree or better at a major UK university 84
- discussion about historical source written by Chevaliar de Seingalt 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27868852459 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60509633589 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.493026777 43.030603864 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.0 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 5.23603664747 267% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180964716576 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881487588686 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526341146947 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124272043583 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189632971077 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.