books and films can help one learn a lot from others
With the development of society and economy, things for amusement proliferate tremendously. Meanwhile, people have more time and money to have fun in their spare time. Hence, the types of books and movies that people enjoy are much more various these days. And when it comes to whether the books and films can help one learn a lot from others, people have no consensus. Some assert that we can by doing so, while others refute with a diametrically different view. For me, I am for the former.
To begin with, books and movies people tend to enjoy can, to some extent, reflect their personalities. Human beings are clever. We often choose to do things that are prone to make the situation favorable for us or just enlighten us. There is no exception for books and movies. Imagine if you dislike a kind of films, will you watch them yourself? The answer is obviously not. People love to watch movies and read books that conform to their taste. And people’s taste for movies and books are the mirror of their hearts and personalities. Take films to illustrate. If you love action movies, maybe you are a tough guy with a strong will. Or if you like love stories, maybe you are soft in the depth of your heart. As the old saying goes, ‘We are what we eat.’ It is exactly the same for books and movies.
Furthermore, the type of the most liked books or movies can showcase the mindset of people, or even their culture basis and background. During the process of reading, it is prone that we focus more on the books that share the similar thinking way with us, since it makes our reading experience way easier and more enjoyable. According to a survey issued by a famous institution in Philadelphia, human kinds love to strike a chord with the authors when reading, not to mention movies. This namely implies that people tend to read books or watch films of the same mindset. At the meantime, one’s thinking method also mirrors his origin, as different cultural background leads to different mindsets. As a result, we can, in turn, figure out how a person thinks by the books he or she has read. ‘If we encounter a man of rare intellect, we should ask him what books he reads.’ Just as Ralph Waldo Emerson once expressed, the books one read are closely concerned with his or her mind. Although refuters may insist that scientists also read love stories, still we are talking about the majority and this truly holds for the masses.
In a nutshell, we can truly learn much from the book and movie lists of people. The lists not only indicate our personalities, but also imply our mindsets or even cultural roots. Possible as the existence of counterexamples is, we still can figure out all the above for the majority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-12 | Eshovo | 85 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | Eshovo | view | |
| 2023-01-18 | Sinara Furlani | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Sushmabenarji | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | Nina Tsarevich | 66 | view |
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children as good citizens and workers To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, still, while, kind of, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64669421488 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47311460456 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4041760894 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5517241379 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6896551724 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72413793103 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254399965638 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664540120317 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102725144913 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165527423408 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707693622225 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.