the graph below shows the number o tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarise the information by selecting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart illustrates the number of people visiting an island of the Caribbean and where they chose to stay in a 7-year-periods from 2010. It is noticeable that the number of visitors visiting the Caribbean island in total experienced a considerable increase throughout the period. The data also indicate that the period brought a slight growth to the number of tourists visiting the Caribbean island who staying on cruise ships, whereas the number of visitors staying on the island experienced a marked elevation during this time.
In 2010, 1 million visitors came to the island. 0.75 million visitors stayed on the island, while another 0.25 million were staying on cruise ships during that year. The following year, the number of tourists in total witnessed a little growth to 1.75 million, half of million visitors stayed on cruise ships while the data for the number of vistitors who stayed on the island saw no change, which is 1.75 million. In the next 2 years, the number of visitors who stayed on the island experienced a slight rise from 0.75 million people to 1.5 million people, while the statistic for that of visitors staying on cruise ships was 0.5 million people.
From 2013 to 2015, there was a subtle rise in the total o 2.75 million tourists 2015. The number of tourists staying on the island witnessed no change while the number of tourists staying on cruise ships experienced significant growth by 1.3 million people. For 2016, 0.75 million tourists were staying on the island and 1.5 million tourists were staying on cruise ships. The total of tourists in that year was 2.75 million visitors. In 2017, 3.5 million people visited the island. Among them, 2 million visitors were staying on cruise ships and 1.5 million tourists stayed on the island.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-04 | gianggaing | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- the graph below shows the number o tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h is 1.75 million. In the next 2 years, the number of visitors who stayed on the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 299.0 196.424390244 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93311036789 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45749085569 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.364548494983 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8593455346 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152002963248 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980390095169 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576269920509 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140207780761 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667130196592 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.