Integrated
In a given sets of material, reading passage disccusses three negtative effects of electronic gadgets, while the speaker argues that all the claims mentioned in the reading related to the electronic devices are not true. Moreover, she believes that paper materil have some limitations.
First, regarding critical thinking both passage and speaker contradict each other. The author of the passage claim that reading via screen rather than paper material hindered people critical thinking. This point is contested by the speaker. She points out that reading from paper materil does not improve critical thinking. Furthermore, she says since reading paper material mostly consist of one source of news as in most cases one news company information mostly is limited. Also, view point of people reading from single source of news paper can be baised. In contrast, people reading from electronic devices can broaden their perspective by reading different materials and can assist them to increase critical thinking.
Secondly, passage claims that electronic devices are detrimental to people health as these devices emit electromagnetic waves that are harmful to brain cells. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. she says that is not the case. She mentions there is no clear proof that these cause any harm to either eye or brain. She argues that people reading from electronic devices needs to stretch their body and are required to change of body postures while reading from electroinc gadgets. Moreover, there is a proof that people who does reading from news paper may experience headache.
Finally, author of reading claims that these devices may cause addiction and can hinder the language and personal emotion skills among people. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says in reality electronic devices enhance social skills by providing a plethora of information sources. She mention people using electronic devices can familirize themselves with varierty of subjects and share feelings and thoughts with several people which helps them to raised the social skills.
- Question Your school has received a gift of money What do you think is the best way for your school to spend this money Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 70
- Question Your school has received a gift of money What do you think is the best way for your school to spend this money Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 73
- If one of your friend is visiting your country and he has just one day which place would you suggest him to go 80
- What do you think is a better way of communication to convey your message text message or direct call 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are never satisfied with what they have they always want something more or something different Use specific reasons to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 535, Rule ID: NEWS_PAPER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newspaper'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: newspaper
...of people reading from single source of news paper can be baised. In contrast, people read...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...s argument is rebutted by the lecturer. she says that is not the case. She mentions...
^^^
Line 7, column 548, Rule ID: NEWS_PAPER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newspaper'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: newspaper
...proof that people who does reading from news paper may experience headache. Finally, au...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 302, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
... a plethora of information sources. She mention people using electronic devices can fam...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44171779141 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52456783114 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0935375375 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3684210526 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.