Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that healthiness becomes a trending topic in this era. Public believe that providing numerous sports facilities help to increase the quality of citizen health. However, others argue it only has less effect and needs other criteria. In this essay, I would discuss two points of view.
In the one hand, the advantage of expanding the sports field is to attract the interest of dwellers to have some exercise. It is because they do not need to make a line to use sports equipment. Apart from that, people have choices to burn calories based on their condition. For example, individuals who could not run, they still have alternative sports such as yoga or swimming. As a result, everyone is able to maintain their fitness effectively. It is clear that the multiplication of sports arena could encourage society to have a healthy lifestyle.
Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages of adding the facilities. Firstly, it gives small changes to public health. The reason is their euphoria to workout is only at the beginning of the construction of new arenas, after trying it, their interest began to decline then back to less move habit. Taken as another example, according to psychology, curiosity feeling would be fallen after several repetitions then lead to boredom. Secondly, sports are not the only measurement of one’s health. It is due to diet have a contribution as well. For illustration, the person who eats fast food regularly which has a bad impact on blood sugar level tends to diabetes. It is no doubt that fitness depends on personal habit.
To sum up where I stand, despite there are some negative effects, I believe that the addition of sports venue stimulate public enthusiasm to make sweat because there are many options and no need to queue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | Alili | 67 | view |
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 84
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main export in 2000 20 and future projection for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The Two Pie Charts Below Show the Online Shopping Sales for Retail Sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, apart from, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94983277592 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72682130184 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6658731459 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8947368421 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.10526315789 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248336870492 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069543101604 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668269461555 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14344695877 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875452863807 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.