Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people contend that students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others refute this by claiming that school time should be used in learning more significant subjects such as Maths or Literature. Both of these view will be discussed before a conclusion is reached.
Beginning with the view that students should be encouraged to study the science of food and how to prepare it, it is essential to apply both theories and practical application. To be specific, many students find it arduous to acquire abstract theories about food, nutrients. Practical application will answer this problem. By acquiring application into studies, students can acquire knowledge better and efficient. In other words, students can prepare their lives in adulthoods better after studying nutrients and steps to cook a simple dish. This tendency can also be applied to many scientific subjects such as Science, chemistry.
Turning to an alternative view, people believe that school time should be used in learning more important subjects. No matters what, the core value of most schools is to prepare their students enough knowledge for exams. Instead of spending time at the schools’ kitchens, students can learn Maths or Literature which are more essential for them to get high grades. By the way of exemplifying, the entry test to university in many Asian countries tend to focus on merely 9 academic subjects categorized into the Social Science and Natural Science. Therefore, spending school time on these subjects allegedly has more advantageous impacts on the future of students.
In conclusion, i believe that science of food should be applied in some particular ages due to the fact that maths or Literature are still the core subjects of schooling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD FOLLOW THE TRADITIONS OF THE SOCIETY WHILE OTHER PEOPLE THINK THAT YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD BE FREE TO BEHAVE AS INDIVIDUALS DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 89
- Some people think that the government should spend more money on public services than public arts To what extent do you agree 84
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some believe that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together while others claim that holding the Olympics wastes money which could be used for important issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e future of students. In conclusion, i believe that science of food should be ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as, by the way, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23591549296 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74653981514 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8813351871 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431747392899 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142563157907 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109471081255 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280819533071 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113979760315 0.056905535591 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.