possibility of having feather by Sinosauropteryx, the fossil of which have been found in China.
The passage and the talk both discuss the possibility of having feather by Sinosauropteryx, the fossil of which have been found in China. The writer contends that this kind of dinosaur could not be feathered. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessments. She demonstrates three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is that the fine lines observed in the fossil may have been formed after the death of animal. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that there have been no such a decomposition in other fossils. Moreover, fossil found in the volcanic ashes turned to be preserved well and there is no evidence in them that shows decomposition.
Second, according to the text, these lines can be associated with frills of the dinosaur not its feather. Although, the speaker finds this idea debatable. She bolsters her opinion by stating that there is a distinct chemical evidence that assures us about relating these lines to the feather of the animal. She says that the fossil contains batacaratin which is a content found in the leather not frills.
Lastly, the lecturer contradicts this fallacy of the passage that feather on the back bone of the animal is useless and can not be used neither for fly nor adjusting the temperature of the Sinosauropteryx, saying that the feather could have other benefits for the animal. She notes that some birds use their feather to attract their mates. She also adds that the evidences show that the feather of this animal was colorful, orange and white actually, so it could definitely use for display.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-04 | majid.fazlollahi | 66 | view |
- Some exclusive features of elephants 75
- the possibilty of the use of an ancient weapon by the Greeks in a war against the Romans 73
- Ways to eliminating the destructive effect of the glass architectures for the flying birds. 80
- The possibility of making colonization on asteroids. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ind of dinosaur could not be feathered. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...frills of the dinosaur not its feather. Although, the speaker finds this idea debatable....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, lastly, may, moreover, second, so, well, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96389891697 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6687321216 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537906137184 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9128330346 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2142857143 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393303919211 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121839068059 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194379625869 0.0662205650399 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236700341152 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129538504742 0.0443174109184 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.