Producing clean energy is an impossible goal. Instead, we need to focus on reducing
energy consumption.'
How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with justification and examples.
In today's fast moving world, everything is completely driven by energy. From large scale industries to small scale factories,
from automobiles sectors to house hold electrical appliances, from spaceship to underwater research - all driven by energy. Considering the rapid growth in technological advancements, the role of energy occupies the most prominent position in deciding the growth of global economy. It is true that producing clean energy is an impossible goal. Instead, we need to focus on reducing energy consumption. Below paragraphs describes about that.
It should be noted that we can generate energy by various sources such as setting up of windmills, setting up of hydroelectric plants and setting large thermal and nuclear power stations. All these are varied sources by which we can generate energy and by which we satisfy our daily needs to some extent. But it also should be noted that the population rate is also surprisingly increasing at a drastic scale and the daily needs of the people is also steadily increasing. Having said that, energy saving is really need of the hour. By saving energy, we not only makes our life easier but also provides the path to the future generation to live peacefully in the planet.
One of the main factors for wastage of energy is mainly due to negligence. People should realise the importance of energy.
The proper usage of energy should be educated right from the childhood itself. For example, even at homes we use electrical items such as Fans, lights for our daily needs and sometimes forget to switch it off back after the usage.
It is now encouraging to see, many of us are now started adhering to "Go-Green" style of living. The idea of generating energy from unwanted items is now in full swing. We have now proper mechanism for recycling of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and also at commercial areas. These are all some of the positive signs to look far.
In conclusion, we all love our mother nature and by saving energy we make our live more eco friendly. Alone we can do a little and together we can do so much. So, let's start use energy diligently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-06 | santhip123 | 55 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | santhip123 | 55 | view |
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 515, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ving said that, energy saving is really need of the hour. By saving energy, we not o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seeing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: seeing
...ter the usage. It is now encouraging to see, many of us are now started adhering to...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'encourage'.
Suggestion: encourage
... recycling of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and also at ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...also at commercial areas. These are all some of the positive signs to look far. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 31.9359605911 185% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1207.87684729 151% => OK
No of words: 369.0 242.827586207 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93224932249 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 3.92707691288 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75322508278 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 379.143842365 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 12.6551724138 182% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2539631981 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1304347826 104.977214359 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0434782609 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 6.9802955665 272% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206489662663 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698317381595 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913733682711 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927494126964 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729979633726 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 515, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ving said that, energy saving is really need of the hour. By saving energy, we not o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seeing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: seeing
...ter the usage. It is now encouraging to see, many of us are now started adhering to...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'encourage'.
Suggestion: encourage
... recycling of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and also at ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...also at commercial areas. These are all some of the positive signs to look far. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 31.9359605911 185% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1207.87684729 151% => OK
No of words: 369.0 242.827586207 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93224932249 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 3.92707691288 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75322508278 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 379.143842365 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 12.6551724138 182% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2539631981 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1304347826 104.977214359 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0434782609 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 6.9802955665 272% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206489662663 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698317381595 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913733682711 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927494126964 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729979633726 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.