The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is tempting to view the world wide web as a substitute for real travel because a plethora of video blogs and documentaries make real-life experience meaningless. However, further analysis shows that true sensations cannot be replaced by virtual emotions.
On the one hand, hundreds or even thousands of other peoples’ experiences of traveling around a destination may be a lot more formative than ours. Tourists uploading their travel blogs or explorers video recording their journeys will tell us more about a spot than we would, providing we had a 2-week vacation. For example, Orel and Reshka TV program shows to the audience all beauties and diversities of places a tourist can visit. This and many other similar examples allow us the conclusion that with the internet capacity, we can crisscross the world without leaving our home and learn a great deal more from other travelers’ experiences than we would ourselves.
On the other hand, observing a foreign country through the screen and other people’s vision is a poor practice. It is vital to get acquainted personally with the culture and its traditions as travelling gives people real emotions and impressions. Can we smell the breeze of the Mediterranean Sea by seeing people delighted? Can we taste and enjoy Italian pizza by looking at the tourists dining out in a cozy café? Or can we feel the pleasant warmth of the sun in Egypt by seeing people basking on the sandy beach? Of course, not. Until the technologies can convey senses, we will have to visit the places of interest by ourselves if we wish to get new feelings.
Summing up, it is true that the capacity of the internet technologies allows people to explore the world without the need to leave their homes and get a broader perspective on the places of their interest than they would, supposed they would travel on their own. Nevertheless, technologies have not achieved the level of humans yet and cannot replace the real experience full of new sensations, such as smell, taste and feel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 84
- The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years 78
- School administrators at an elementary school have recently decided to increase the amount of hours spent teaching kids about robotics computer programming and other elements of science and technology However they were forced to reduce the amount of hours 90
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they used to This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public for culture In general and for the futur 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, for example, of course, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95014662757 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77988541475 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568914956012 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0406263141 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118532683636 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410371531211 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495543204192 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670752665391 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030088481824 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.