In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The government is responsible for taking care of each and every citizen of the country. In the world, every developed country has made the well-developed system in each sector in such a way that, it is well justified in its society's point of view as well as the perception of its financial growth. The financial support given to the senior citizen in Britain is considered as a positive and a responsible approach of its government as per my opinion. However, the decision of giving such support should be on the bases of numerous relevant factors.
The concern shown here in this topic lead to the discussion regarding the priority given to the health care sector. In Britain, which is one of the well- developed country in the world, the health and support given to the old people in such a way that they can be facilitated by all the basis need like finance, food and medication. The senior citizen who have spent their whole life working in any private of government organization, who have paid tax to the government in a hope that in their retirement phase of life, government will pay them back in the form of pension, health support or other ways as per the government structure. Moreover, providing shelter in the form of old age home to particular person means a lot to that person in many ways. Firstly, in an emotional point of view, it makes the person positive, and emotionally strong. Secondly, if they are living around people of the same ages, they find friends to make who understand them and who make them comfortable by sharing their good or bad stories to the person who is at the same level of maturity and perhaps, facing the same situation. The Emotional support is most important to make a person alive in any situation as per my opinion. Hence the action taken by the British government to fulfill their duties towards their senior citizen is helpful by all means.
On the other hand, the financial support given to this approach by the government is the matter of debate sometimes as it involves the considerable proportion of budget. There must be criteria made by such government organization to be satisfied before giving financial support to any person. Factors such as his financial background, family detail, family's concern towards them, professional career background, social situation. The situation in which the person's family is settled enough to take care of their elders, it is not necessary to move them to old age home. It may create negative impact as well if they are not happy with this decision and do not feel comfortable. It is beneficial as a financial point of view of the government also as it includes well-developed infrastructure, and large number of staff to provide such facility.
In the conclusion, after considering both perspective towards the situation presented here, I would appreciate the approach of Britain government who understand their responsibility towards the society. However, the decision shall be varied person to person and based on the decided criteria. But the government should confirm by doing regular survey that each person is getting what is necessary for them and makes them happy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Skinny | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | Arshdeep0900 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | Firdouspathan | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | Assemkhidhr | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | Maryagema | 56 | view |
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family Give 56
- Arctic deers 50
- our current way of life have a negative impact on future generation 70
- To serve the housing need of our students the buckinghum college 50
- Topic genius in nothing more then a another therm of obsession 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ive in any situation as per my opinion. Hence the action taken by the British governm...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...l situation. The situation in which the persons family is settled enough to take care o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 1615.20841683 163% => OK
No of words: 536.0 315.596192385 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92164179104 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79009431897 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455223880597 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 830.7 506.74238477 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7808432817 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.619047619 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5238095238 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267670873959 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761651553237 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563056013932 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160242429671 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420293096221 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.