Some people think that richer countries should provide poorest countries with help that is not financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Firstly, one of the best way to make a strong alliance among the countries is to help each other when they are bound to suffer the problems. Financial aid could be beneficial when countries have to face the incidental trouble such as natural disaster. But, sharing the idea from the rich country could be the significant assistance for the sustainable development. Being the rich is to be improved in infrastructure, if one country is able to share his improving process in infrastructure, the copy past process would be seen effectively. For example, China had shared the ideas, precautions as well as some significant physical materials to Nepal to control of spreading of newly virus during the pandemic, were not a financial aid but an effective help.
In addition, why fiscal supports should not give to poor country is that if the developed country gives the continuous assistance, under developing country would become the dependent over the riche. It is common to foretell that being helped leads to less maturity because they always expect that when they would be helped. In other words, even naturals resources is a crucial thing to boost up the country towards the developed. If a country can able to utilize it by sharing ideas with developed nations, infrastructure could improve rapidly. For instance, Nepal has a lot of mines of luxurious resources but unable to use it effectively. Consequence, Nepal is bounding to take a help of India. But by the wide through, if Nepal can able to find out its use like as Indian, the infrastructure of Nepal could be developed rapidly.
In conclusion, the supports of richer countries to the poorest country should not be fiscal aid because it creates less mature as well as dependent, whereas sharing the ideas could be the best way to make a strong alliance and to be success in development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iance and to be success in development.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9391025641 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87599674001 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2056410232 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206652697318 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770543090508 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534865387172 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155099375639 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136523961859 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.