The charts below show the value of one country's export in various categories during 2015&2016.
The line graph illustrates the information about the export in different department in the 2015 and 2016.
Overall, the export activities divided in the five different groups.it augmention and alivation is directly effect on the country economy.this informatin had only two years.
First of all, the textiles industries growth values was maximum in the average of the both year. In the 2015, it was almost cross the quater. Whereas, the petroleum items was earning 60 billions in 2015, and next year it above 3% then previous year. One particular field was similar in the both year, it was agricultural products, it was earn more then 30 billions and also augmented in values (0.81%)
Secondly, only one thing, which was alivate value, it was gams and jewellery. It down (5.18%), but it made atlist 43% billions in 2015, after year it alivated 3%.the second highest good was cross the 60 billions in 2016, and almost 58% in 2015. It was engineered good. It was also augment in value of 8.5% in both years.
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantage 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind if the meat in European countries between 1979and 2004 56
- The first char below shoe how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart show the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices in everyday matters is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important for children to make decision about ma 56
- The pie chart below show the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...it augmention and alivation is directly affect on the country economy.this informatin had...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...r, it was agricultural products, it was earn more then 30 billions and also augmente...
^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...agricultural products, it was earn more then 30 billions and also augmented in value...
^^^^
Line 6, column 268, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...st 58% in 2015. It was engineered good. It was also augment in value of 8.5% in bo...
^^
Line 6, column 280, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'augmented'.
Suggestion: augmented
...15. It was engineered good. It was also augment in value of 8.5% in both years.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86627906977 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53426357893 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.6351482969 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143282086188 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674430657731 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412176896713 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10165838709 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354330341082 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.