Advantages and disadvantages of being a member of a large family
Living in a large family of brothers and sisters has both benefits and drawbacks.
It can be seen that in a large family the children are happier because they can play with the same age ones. They all learn to be creative and develope their imaginations when playing together. The amusement also is twice as sharing with another.
Furthermore, the children also learn how to forgive and get along with others. There was definitely some siblings quarrelling and fighting. But from that they could empathize each other. They will have another sight when they stand in opposite position.
A young man who is the member of a large family recieve a support system as they grow up and become young adults. Some advice from siblings could help them come over the troubles. They will never be alone in the world.
On the other hand, there are certain disadvantages. First of all, the parents cannot give so much individual attention to each child when there are so many children to take care. Therefore, some children feel upset or jeolous when they think that they are not received a well care like other ones.
Probably, too, there is hardly any privacy. In a large family, the children may have to share bedrooms with her or his siblings. It can be lead to more quarrelling and feeling upset.
To sump up, being a member of a large family brings not only advantages but also disadvantages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-25 | Hannah445 | view | |
2023-10-12 | Van-j | 37 | view |
2023-08-28 | fakesbdunk | view | |
2023-08-07 | Truong Tan Thuan | 56 | view |
2023-08-07 | Truong Tan Thuan | 10 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sisters has both benefits and drawbacks It can be seen that in a large family th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, so, therefore, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64049586777 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34652899984 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 242.0 20.2975951904 1192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1123.0 106.682146367 1053% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 242.0 20.7667163134 1165% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 88.0 7.06120827912 1246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296259508333 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.296259508333 0.084324248473 351% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185516752774 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187058776637 0.056905535591 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 121.4 13.0946893788 927% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -165.69 50.2224549098 -330% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 96.5 11.3001002004 854% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.11 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.12 8.58950901804 211% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 9.78957915832 552% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 98.8 10.1190380762 976% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 10.7795591182 501% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.