The graphs below show the percentage of math graduate and all graduates who got full time job after graduating from a university in Australia, and also show the average salary of both these types of grads, from 2004 to 2012.
The given line chart and table give information for the proportion of full time employment and average yearly salary for Math and all graduates from an Australian university in an eight-year period, between the year 2004 and 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that the Math graduates surpassed all graduates for both fulltime employment and average salary. Additionally, the percentage of fulltime employment remained unchanged over the year period, whereas the salaries went up with time.
In 2004, the proportion of Math graduates got fulltime jobs was 80%, while only 65% of all graduates guaranteed fulltime employment. The percentage of both Math and all graduates slightly increased approximate 10% over two years. However, after the year 2008, the proportion dropped for both and made up the same values in 2012 compared to the year 2004.
Looking at the statistic for the average salary in two years, 2004 and 2006, Math and all graduates had the same salary with $41,000 and $43,000, respectively. The salaries of both Math and all graduates rose continuously with time but Math graduates’ salary went up higher and more rapidly than all graduates in the next six years. In 2012, Math graduates got pay of $56,000 while others got only $51,000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-18 | qnhisonthwaytoul | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-05 | nguyen.buituan | 72 | view |
| 2021-04-05 | nguyen.buituan | 46 | view |
| 2020-09-24 | quynhnhi280103 | 54 | view |
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years 96
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 86
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produces 73
- The graphs below show the percentage of math graduate and all graduates who got full time job after graduating from a university in Australia and also show the average salary of both these types of grads from 2004 to 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... give information for the proportion of full time employment and average yearly salary fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08292682927 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68365400345 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50243902439 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6588910238 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411915378015 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193524830124 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735763247435 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26436503382 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046914323997 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.