The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behavior.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, many educators spend time on finding a better way to teach children how to become independence and the way to express themselves. However, in many places in the world, many teachers still use flagellations as the way to punish children when they make mistake. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this phenomenon.
First of all, children would be endured some negative effects if teachers take for granted to punish children by violent. It is because physical punishment from teachers only makes children feel anxiety and inferiority complex from then on while it is not the purpose of education. For example, when my close friend was young, she did not remember to do homework so her teacher hit her hand heavily since it was a spectre of my friend.
In addition, chastisement does not solve the roof of trouble. When an adult or teacher punish a child, they want them to understand deeply the reason why the child made mistakes and want them do not repeat it again in the future. However, physical punishment can not do that. Give an example, if teacher or adult only punish children without help them know clearly the reason why children are punished, they will do it again.
In conclusion, I think that chastisement is not the best way to help children develop their behavior. Because chastisement just makes children more and more anxiety and inferiority complex while teachers should have a coffee chat with students and make them understand they must not do it again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-21 | phamkhuyen | 56 | view |
- The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The Internet is now used all around the world as a source of information and communication However it s often controversial so many people think it needs to be controlled Others believe there should be no interference whatsoever Discuss both points of vie 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, then, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9209486166 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6280869897 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6788304968 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149080005315 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601463153006 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368643070723 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870618700581 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141853741645 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.