The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls In the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 & 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares three types of telephone calls used by UK residents by the number of minutes/by total calling time/ by calls duration over the period of 8 years.
It is clear that local calls were the most common in Britain, second and third are national and international calls and calls on mobiles respectively. Despite the highest minutes, the number of minutes spent on local calls did not change between 1995 and 2002;on the other hand/however, there was a dramatic increase in the number of remaining categories.
UK resident spent 90 billion minutes for local calls, which is the highest figure show on the chart. By contrast, the amount of duration on local calls was three seconds minutes more than that of national and international one and twice minutes more than that of mobiles one with 60, 45 minutes for the highest point in each respectively.
Over the period of 8 year, the number of minutes on national and international calls gradually rise from the beginning at around 38 billion minutes to 60 billion minutes at the end of the period. Besides, it is noticeable that mobiles also quickly went up to 40 billion minutes from 1995 to 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-24 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | LUCIALUSO | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 10 | view |
| 2022-09-06 | Iqreet Kaur | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vananhxh2005 | view |
- International migration in UK
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls In the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- International migration in UK
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.865 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6166725053 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2387768485 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277865146947 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143298102311 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534433153574 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183282336868 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457853527723 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.