People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Many people believe that an increase in the petrol price for private cars could be helpful to cope with the environmental issues. While I consider that this might be an effective measure, I would argue
that other measures might have an even greater impact.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some consider that the matters associate with the environment ought to be handled by adding up the price of fuel. The first reason is the climbing up in the costs of fossil fuel would limit the number of car journeys. In addition, if the action is applied, it would encourage traders to travel goods by rail. As a result, the vehicle emissions and green gas effect could be reduced by the applications.
On the other hand, other measures more effective. Firstly, the introduction of congestion charges which is applied in London and achieved a positive reaction is one of the feasible solutions. The money which was collected by congestion charges was used in improving the public transport system in this country. Furthermore, to encourage residents to remote by buses and trains, the government could free the public transport passes. All of these solutions are able to reduce the use of cars and improve air quality.
In conclusion, masses claim that the price of petrol should be going up, but other transport measures would be conducted at the same time to help the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88235294118 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64251978448 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584033613445 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1051873621 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160322321185 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544926342829 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521343816894 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804820289898 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266922821199 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.