Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
You should write at least 150 words.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The bar chart compares three income groups in terms of 3 different types of fast food in UK in 1990.
Overall, it is noticeable that there were differences in each of the food eaten. Also, the low income group spent the lowest amount
People in high income group spent their income more on hamburger, at 42 pence a week, compared to 17 pence on fish and chips and 19 pence on pizza. In the average income group, they also spent more on hamburger, at 32 pence a week. Although their spending on hamburger was lower than the high income group, their expenditure on fish and chips was higher, at 25 pence a week. Their spending on pizza accounted for the lowest figure, which was only 12 pence.
By contrast, people spent more on fish and chips in the low income group, at 16 pence per week. However, their spending on hamburger and pizza were much lower, at 14 and 6 pence respectively.
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below You should write at least 150 words You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 61
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over 4 seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 word 57
- The line graphs below show the value of Australian trading with China Japan and the United States Value is calculated in term of Australian dollars billions 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...low income group spent the lowest amount People in high income group spent their ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 937.175257732 77% => OK
No of words: 162.0 206.0 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48148148148 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31207244963 2.54303337028 91% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 127.690721649 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 290.88556701 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9583110517 44.8134815571 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 76.5299724578 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 16.8248392259 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 4.34317383033 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.047192032301 0.216113520407 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027912311141 0.0766984524023 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0213813685205 0.0603063233224 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0258159418415 0.12726935374 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259062342365 0.0580467560999 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 8.37731958763 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 8.71597938144 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 7.59969072165 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 41.2886597938 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.