The graph below gives information about household car ownership in Britain from 1970 to 2010.
The given graph delineates changes in the number of cars per British household over a period of 40 years.
Overall, it is noticeable that the percentage of households which own one or more cars rose, while the opposite was true for families without a car.
From 1970 onwards, the figure for one - car households stood at 35 % and after five years of fluctuating, this rate jumped rapidly to 55% in 1985. over the next 15 years, it constantly changed then reached a peak of 65% in 2010. On the other hand, the proportion of families had two or more car started at just over 10% before slightly falling in 1975 . Afterwards it is forecasted to gently recover to about 25% by over the course of 15 years, eventually the figure witnessed the highest point around 40%.
As illustrated, granted, the household with no car was the most common type from the late 1970s, but it immediately saw a dramatic drop from more than half to 30% only in 20 years after that. Notably, this percentage remained stable until significantly falling to roughly 15% .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-08 | Ly Nguyen VN | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Ly Nguyen VN | 70 | view |
- Despite huge improvements in healthcare the overall standard of physical health in many developed countries is now falling What could bethe reason for this trend and what can be done to reverse it 70
- The graph below gives information about household car ownership in Britain from 1970 to 2010 84
- The graph below gives infimation about household car ownership in Britain from 1970 to 2010 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...his rate jumped rapidly to 55% in 1985. over the next 15 years, it constantly change...
^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...over 10% before slightly falling in 1975 . Afterwards it is forecasted to gently r...
^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...til significantly falling to roughly 15% .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69398907104 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60403099773 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688524590164 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1140997322 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205187660729 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794720364569 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521391731437 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121284027257 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148203474293 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.