The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years
The line chart provides the data on how much rubbish was produced from three organizations from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the companies A and B experienced a decreasing trend in waste production while the amounts of waste produced by company C increased over the assessed period. At the beginning of the period, the waste materials of company A was the highest but the waste output of company C was the greatest by the end of the period.
Looking first at the commencing of the period, the waste output of company A was the highest volume, with its figure being 12 tonnes. This was followed by the waste production of companies A and B, with their respective quantities being 7 and 4 tonnes . From 2000 to 2005, companies B and C witnessed a significant increase to 11 and 6 tonnes of waste in turn while it was 2 tonnes which the amount of waste produced company A decreased over 5 years .
Turning to the finishing of the period, the company C experienced a dramatically growth to 11 tonnes which overtook company A and C while the companies A and B fell considerably in turn to 8 and 3 tonnes of waste.
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years 67
- The bar graph below shows amount of carbon emissions in different countries during different years 73
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart provides the data on how ...
^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the waste production of companies A and B, with their respective quantities bein...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...spective quantities being 7 and 4 tonnes . From 2000 to 2005, companies B and C w...
^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes . From 2000 to 2005, companies B and C witnessed a significant increase to 1...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and C witnessed a significant increase to 11 and 6 tonnes of waste in turn whi...
^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nessed a significant increase to 11 and 6 tonnes of waste in turn while it was 2...
^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of waste produced company A decreased over 5 years . Turning to the finishin...
^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oduced company A decreased over 5 years . Turning to the finishing of the perio...
^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...duced company A decreased over 5 years . Turning to the finishing of the period...
^^
Line 6, column 67, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...f the period, the company C experienced a dramatically growth to 11 tonnes which overtook company A a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the companies A and B fell considerably in turn to 8 and 3 tonnes of waste. ...
^^
Line 6, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es A and B fell considerably in turn to 8 and 3 tonnes of waste.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53921568627 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79771731414 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460784313725 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4856188354 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344617952628 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18168674347 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976706039839 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206812301958 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113336178656 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.