Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
With the increase in technology, there is also an increase in competition among students of the university to get a good score which will lead to better job opportunities. Due to this increase, students hardly get time to indulge in other activities. However, I mostly agree with the premise that in the university there should be different courses apart from the field of studies because of the below reasons. However, I do concede that excessive importance to the other activities is also not beneficial to the student.
Firstly, Nowadays, University students are swamped with university assignments, exams, deadlines. They hardly get time to work on hobbies. This over-involvement sometimes leads to frustration and even distracts from studies. If the university allows taking a course of student’s choice along with the academic study, students will get more involved in university work, they will love to come to university. For example, famous bollywood actor Kartik Aryan is an engineer and as well as an actor. In his university days, he joined a university drama group which helped him to excel in both fields and it mainly helped to keep him lively and helped to focus on studies as well. Thus, courses outside the field of study can keep one refreshed and increases dedication towards studies.
Secondly, pursuing a different course along with study leads to the growth of not only an individual but also contributes to the nation's growth. For example, India's former President Late DR. APJ Kalam was a scientist first and then became president of India, he is not only a scientist, president but also a writer who still influences people around the globe. He was able to achieve all this because along with studies he gave some time to extra circular activity in his college. Thus, if the university provides training as per the students’ interest, they can achieve success in many fields which will ultimately lead to countries' growth.
If the university introduces courses along with the field of study, there should be limited time assign to it. Because other courses might distract students rather than improving attention. The course should be introduced considering refreshment and hobby development. Thus, If the university introduces courses outside student's fields of study it will definitely help in the growth of students as well as the country.
- Do you agree or disagree A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 66
- Summarize the main points of the lecture and highlight how the lecture interacts with the text 3
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... individual but also contributes to the nations growth. For example, Indias former Pres...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re should be limited time assign to it. Because other courses might distract students r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, apart from, as for, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18701298701 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80257694106 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3272143116 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.85 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371840495774 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115447734129 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102549503829 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255779064137 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104442306377 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.