Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicals intended for human uses Others however think it is cruel and unnecessary to do that Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicals intended for human uses. Others, however, think it is cruel and unnecessary to do that. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. There has been a controversy among people over the necessity and humanity of this test. Though I am an advocate of animal testing, each side has its own reasons and I will explain them in greater detail in the following.
On the one hand, animal experiment benefits human. Life develops, followed by plague and diseases that pose a threat to human’s life. Animals whose genes bear much resemblance to human’s, for example, guinea pigs, are used to assess new vaccine and medicines. Without animal testing beforehand, these medications will be used on humans without no guarantee of safety, which may end up with severe changes in their body, or even take their lives.
On the other hand, animal testing can be considered cruel. Human makes use of other species for one’s own sake, forcing them to use new and even toxic chemicals without taking their feelings into consideration. However, this is unavoidable. There is nothing that can replace animal experiment at the moment. Until when there is something can, humanity have to sacrifice other spicies’ lives so as to save their own lives.
To conclude, I believe that vivo experiment is irreplaceable at the moment, despite the unfairness to other species. It has been a bone of contention eversince its invention. Conflicting opinion revolving around it will not stop until there is an alternative.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-03 Cao Thị Hương Trà 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
... better than vegetables and plain meat. A large number of people lead a sedentary lifestyle. Afte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34893617021 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89585020209 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.685106382979 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9946115684 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5625 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6875 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0944835255055 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301347577069 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407518708503 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580735917865 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055773362194 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.