The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts give information about the gender and number of athletes who have entered the Games since they started. The bar chart illustrates the number of men and women entering the Games, whereas the line graph shows the number of participants.
It is evident from the bar chart that, until 2012, there were always significantly more men entering the Games than women. In 1924 and 1952, there were hardly any women entering the Games, yet in 1952 there were over 4,000 male participants. In 2012, however, the number of female athletes rose significantly to nearly 5,000, only approximately 1,000 lower than male participants.
The line graph shows a similar trend, with the number of participants increasing throughout the century. The most significant increase occurred between 1984 and 2012, when the number of athletes rose from just over 6,000 to over 10,000 in 2012.
To summarise therefore, since 1924 the number of athletes entering the Olympic Games, has increased dramatically. This is particularly the case for women, who are now represented in nearly the same numbers as male participants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | quykute291203 | 95 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | rajpatel90 | view |
- globalization 78
- The chart shows that high income earners consumed considerably more fast foods than the other income groups spending more than twice as much on hamburgers 43 pence per person per week than on fish and chips or pizza both under 20 pence Average income earn 38
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities To what extent do you agree Use specific details and examples to explain your view 80
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment What factors may have caused this situation and what in your opinion can should be done about it Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23463687151 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79161960864 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558659217877 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 11.1853078237 43.030603864 26% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148938293196 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782021537346 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918689976332 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106716060385 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868730445853 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.