Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Choosing the field of study, one should consider that interest and talent is the main reason and another point of view is that availability is the best reasoning choosing the study field.
People in this world come with an intrinsic talent and feel a passion toward anything he /she likes. On the other hand, Demand is the thing that is created in a particular time in a particular field. So one matter is always continuous and another varies from place to place and time to time. Like 200 years ago, No one knows about computers let alone studying. Now, this is a trending one in the world. So availability depends on time and place.
In this particular ambivalent situation, I think both statements are right. Either jobs availability or talent depends wholly on person to person, time to time, place to place.No one is discarded with unified reasoning in any side. so I think choosing Study field one should consider jobs availability as well as talent or passion.
First of all, I would like to address the Talents and passion. If a person doesn't have passion in any particular field, he will feel disgusted within a year. So doing very good things, passion is a must. Think about Einstein, if he didn't feel passionate or didn't have talent in theoretical physics, would we get any this theory of relativity or we still believe the Newtonian physics forever? So passion, as well as talent, is very much needed for cutting-edge results.
In my second opinion, if you have talent and passion in a particular field, but don't have any demand on this subject. So being a pundit is fruitless. No one wanted to know about it. No one will show any interest in what you have exactly done. It becomes priceless. But a subject which has so demand on the job market but neither you have talent in this subject nor passion. So choosing this study field goes in vain. You will be then a jobless person.
So in I think for doing very good, One should consider both talent or passion as well as job availability. Then the person will be successful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | mkm462 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | ZHOU0444 | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | Sujan Adhikari | 50 | view |
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reas 50
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Peter Jones In order to relieve Briggsville s notorious traffic congestion Mayor Harrison Peter Jones plans to build a multi million dollar subway system The subway will run through the major 55
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 50
- d 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...think both statements are right. Either jobs availability or talent depends wholly o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: No
...to person, time to time, place to place.No one is discarded with unified reasoning...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ded with unified reasoning in any side. so I think choosing Study field one should...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to study'
Suggestion: To study
...soning in any side. so I think choosing Study field one should consider jobs availabi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ss the Talents and passion. If a person doesnt have passion in any particular field, h...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... is a must. Think about Einstein, if he didnt feel passionate or didnt have talent in...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...instein, if he didnt feel passionate or didnt have talent in theoretical physics, wou...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... and passion in a particular field, but dont have any demand on this subject. So bei...
^^^^
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... should consider both talent or passion as well as job availability. Then the person will ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, then, well, i think, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63812154696 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53270328712 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469613259669 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5783106313 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.16 118.986275619 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.48 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187350336524 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585670077879 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901203366218 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13297521937 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895052715414 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 14.1392134831 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.04 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.