The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The given charts depict the explanations and the prime problems for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
Overall, most people argued for their travel inasmuch as they needed to commute to and from work. Meanwhile, price of travel was the underlying issue for the travelling public.
At the bar chart, nearly half of US residents surveyed travelled by reason of work, which was more than double the rate of those with personal reasons, at 19%. Meanwhile, the percentage of US inhabitants with their reason of shopping was 16%, followed by 10% and 6% of those taking social/recreation and their need to visit friends/relatives into account, respectively.
With regard to the main issues for travelling public, 36% of US people surveyed cited price of travel as their problem. The same figure was seen in the proportions of those concerned about safety and aggressive drivers, at almost 18% each. In the meantime, highway congestion was the fourth most common issue, which was considered by 14% of US inhabitants. Finally, the rates of those worrying about access to public transport and space for pedestrians were 8% and 6%, correspondingly.
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98841508447 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9766728264 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.111111111 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413759418949 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196582231873 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166964843334 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296453475155 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114301294789 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.