In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In many nations, people believe that investing in new railway construction is crucial to travel from and to cities, others supposed that it is , instead, better to spend on enhancing current public transportation. While there are benefits to erecting new railway systems, I would argue that public transport development offer more advantages.
On the one hand, new railway lines are attractive for several reasons. First, creating more railway lines can reduce the amount of traffic conjunction in big cities. Nowadays, traveling by roads can be tiring due to the overpopulation of many cites that causes residents to spend hours getting stuck in traffic. In addition, if there were to be fast railway systems, it would be much easier to travel in between cities. These systems help people working far from home commute to the workplace without constant worry of getting late or being worn out along the way.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons, in my opinion, why government should be fixing existing public transportation. First and foremost, it will help on the overall look of the city. Since most of the public transport users are either tourists or college students, their impression of the city is based on what they experienced which can, eventually, be the impression of the world. Second, developing current transporting systems for the public is a sensible way to reduce the amount of toxic emission to the atmosphere. People do not have to buy their own personal vehicles any more if the public transportation is modern and eco-friendly enough for them to use.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the advantages of enhancing the public transportation outweigh that of building new railway lines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Vivi_peach | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | Behnaz.babayani | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | mina_sharifi | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | aaaudrey43 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | S.Ranaut | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both view 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at l 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In many nations, people believe that investing in new railway construction is...
^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g in new railway construction is crucial to travel from and to cities, others sup...
^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd to cities, others supposed that it is , instead, better to spend on enhancing c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10247349823 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86128762477 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583038869258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3718882346 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261257449228 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088641338141 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461947479829 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153993066519 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294851406504 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.