The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010
The pie charts compare different areas for exportation of three nations, namely Argentina, Mexico and Chile in 2010
Overall, while Latin America was the largest export market of Argentina and Chile, this region accounted for a really marginal fraction of Mexico’s destinations of export. Nonetheless, most of the Mexican goods were exported to USA and Chile showed the evenest distribution in its export-markets
With regard to Argentina, Other Latin America was the largest market of its exportation, which accounted for 38% of total export-destinations of this country. Likewise, this figure for Chile was also the highest with 31%. Both nations showed a similar pattern in the markets of the USA and other areas, comprising roughly two-fifths of the whole charts collectively.
In contrast, Latin America was the least popular export region for Mexico. While Europe was the second-most popular export market of Argentina and Chile, the figure for Mexico was merely 6%, even with other Latin America and other areas. Remarkably, USA constituted nearly a three-quarter of the Mexican chart with 62%, being 10 times higher than that of the any other markets
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this Give reasons for your answer and inclu 73
- The charts below give information about the diet and general health of two groups of students 79
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igher than that of the any other markets
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, nonetheless, really, second, so, while, as for, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39344262295 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89745306364 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0188454499 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2857142857 5.23603664747 273% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227986020574 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101795290001 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832136374187 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172195304151 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839105882876 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.