Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Policies that focus on protecting environment should not be imposed upon multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy; even though they cause damage to the environment.
Policies are the fundamental part of a governmental decigions that help to run the nation smoothly, without any hindrance and sustaining a well develpoed economic and social balance. The issue suggests that, the policies that focus on protecting environment should not be inposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy, even due to the actions taken by such organisatios cause damage to the environment. In my openion, I strongly disagree with such policies, as they might be an impedement in various aspects in flurishing of fauna and ferna.
Nurtureing and protecting environment and wild habitiat, is the main motive of human beings as we live in co-ordination with each other. If any of the elements gets obsolete, the world might not be able to sustain. Thus, the enviromnment needs to be nurtured and handled with care for an overall development of our society and we cannot let the multinatiional organizations which help to boost the ecomnomy, but on the other side of the coin, they devastate the environment.
If such organizations, continue to damage our environment without any regulations and policies implemented on them to stop doing so, the world mighr not be able to sustain for a long time. And eventually would lead to total devastation of our world. For example if a compeny is producing some goods which produce harmful byproduct which is toxic to the environment. If such harmful byprduct is managed by throwing into the river which nurtures several aquatic animals and if the same river waster is used to supply our homes. Then such kind of actions might cause devastation and leading to death of several aquatic animals and viral infections to thoses who consume such kind of toxic water. Even if such companies help in boosting economy, due to such kind of malpractices, the disdvantages overpower the disadvantages.
Such kind of heneious act can be stopped throuch implementation of several policies and regulaiotns in manageing the harmful byproducts or any kind of acts related to devastation of evnironment. If such policies are
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-30 | Abraham04 | 58 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | gayatri5323 | 80 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 70 | view |
- Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these c 50
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of fami 58
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 50
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reasons on which that claim is based CLAIM The value of integrating different disciplines in a curriculum is overestimated in the present times REASON E 80
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... related to devastation of evnironment. If such policies are
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, thus, well, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07167882991 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8111087949 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0693410977544 0.243740707755 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031055692931 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348761245958 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0484630052347 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153920827963 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.