Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the world. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the good habits is visiting art galleries because people can absorb many knowledge in art, especially history or culture about countries. Some comments believe that art galleries need to focus on their own country's works; however, I strongly advocate that other countries' pieces should be displayed in each gallery.
To begin with, if art galleries supply artworks in many different countries, citizens can have a chance to increase their understanding of foreign works. This means that humans can have a broad view of how humans have created a masterpiece in the past until now. For example, Leonardo da Vinci, a famous artist in the past, if art galleries focus on their own national artworks, their citizens will lack knowledge about one of the best Italian artists. Besides that, true art enthusiasts will criticize galleries that do not supply enough artworks they need, which will lower the ranking of the galleries.
Another bad effect that the citizen could receive when galleries show artworks about the history and culture of their own country is that people will not have a wide range of perspectives. This implies that, with one picture, people in America will have different viewpoints compared with Vietnamese. Take, VietNam 30/4/1975 as an example, VietNam liberated the independence of South Vietnam from the American government. With the Vietnamese, it marked a transition to unify the country; however, with American, it marked a defeat and withdrew all military troops and many American and Vietnamese residents in the south at that time back to America. From this instance, we can assume that different perspectives can supply humans with different views, which can be the most important in art history and culture.
All things considered, art galleries that focus on their country's own history and culture can be considered good galleries. However, supply citizens with a wider perspective and other masterpieces from different people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | Naomi_manager | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | huy04 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO 04 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...art galleries because people can absorb many knowledge in art, especially history or...
^^^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...art galleries because people can absorb many knowledge in art, especially history or culture a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...th, if art galleries supply artworks in many different countries, citizens can have a chance t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun American seems to be countable; consider using: 'many Americans'.
Suggestion: many Americans
...at and withdrew all military troops and many American and Vietnamese residents in the south a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, thus, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28434504792 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69361475204 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5303514377 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9320501917 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.230769231 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198667716748 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825623939832 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779176367956 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156666370601 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061316830078 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.