Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains moderate amounts of caffeine, a stimulant that is not without side effects, including sleeplessness, irritability, and headaches. A long-term study has found that those who drink more than three cups of green tea a day are likely to have symptoms similar to those that chronic coffee drinkers, another source of caffeine, suffer. Therefore, it is important that anyone who chooses to drink green tea limit their intake to no more than two cups a day.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author stated that green tea has side effects like coffee, therefore people should limit the intake of green tea per day. To butress his/her idea, a study has been mentioned. Although the statement sound reasonable at first sight, there are several evidence needed to butress his/her arguments.
First, we are not sure how long this study is performed to determine whether the study is valid. The author only mentioned a long-term study has been conducted. However, The study may only be conducted in two weeks, and within two weeks, there can be other factors affecting the study. For example, people who take part in the study may happen to be a group of students who are preparing for exams. Therefore, the side effects may be the result of stress, instead of tea.
Second, people who involve in the study may affect the outcome of it. The author should provide the details of the people who participate the study. For example, maybe some of them doesn't only drink tea, but also drink coffee as well, then the side effect may come from coffee. Moreover, perhaps some of them are adolescents, who are relatively sensitive to caffeine, therefore have reported more side effects.
Third, it is unclear how many caffeine in tea make people suffer. Even if tea does have the symptom the author has mentioned, still, it is not precise enough to only suggest limit the intake to no more than two cups a day. Since there are multiple kinds of green tea, with different amount of caffeine. The author should be specific about how many caffeine in tea cause the symptoms.
Taken together, the author should provide the length of the study, details of people who participate in the study, and the amount of caffeine which cause the symptoms to strengthen his/her arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | jayauen | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | sag15 | 53 | view |
| 2022-04-09 | harvey_elliot | 62 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Bolaji | 45 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | megha tomar | 73 | view |
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 33
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 66
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 58
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 308 350
No. of Characters: 1418 1500
No. of Different Words: 147 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.189 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.604 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.224 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 97 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.118 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.738 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.59 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.2 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some evidence'.
Suggestion: some evidence
...nd reasonable at first sight, there are several evidence needed to butress his/her arguments. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-term study has been conducted. However, The study may only be conducted in two w...
^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... study. For example, maybe some of them doesnt only drink tea, but also drink coffee a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refore have reported more side effects. Third, it is unclear how many caffeine i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun caffeine seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much caffeine', 'a good deal of caffeine'.
Suggestion: much caffeine; a good deal of caffeine
... effects. Third, it is unclear how many caffeine in tea make people suffer. Even if tea ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun caffeine seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much caffeine', 'a good deal of caffeine'.
Suggestion: much caffeine; a good deal of caffeine
...The author should be specific about how many caffeine in tea cause the symptoms. Taken tog...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, therefore, third, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 304.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86184210526 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33743435774 2.78398813304 84% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8362891294 57.8364921388 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9411764706 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 5.70786347227 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1665304805 0.218282227539 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613381260013 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607958322527 0.0701772020484 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989782695132 0.128457276422 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694097817569 0.0628817314937 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.