Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
While individuals opine that food science and its preparation should be incorporated into the curriculum, others suggest that school time be devoted to core subjects. From my perspective, an equal measure of time should be focused on studying these subjects, and I will further elaborate in this essay.
Firstly, it is common knowledge that the acquisition of food science procures people a deep insight into human nutrition because both fields are interrelated. Therefore, those acquiring a broad horizon of this study of food are likely to improve their health and fitness by applying their self-knowledge to daily diets. For example, experts in this domain such as dieticians or food scientists can maintain a moderate intake of vitamins and minerals as well as identify unwholesome food. Secondly, preparing meals is generally considered an indispensable soft skill for most people who want to live independently. Thus, adolescents and adults equipped with cooking or preparing food can lead their own lives without relying on others.
However, several individuals advocate a more intensive dedication of time and efforts to learning core subjects such as Math or Information Technology instead of non-academic ones. This tendency springs from a relentless need for medical and technological growth, leading to an increasing demand for skilled workers of these domains to facilitate progress. Consequently, they are paid higher, garner prestigious accolades, which attracts a plurality of teenagers and learners. Besides, supporters of the latter view may think that a high command of academic subjects such as Math or Physics affords learners various benefits. For an instance, based on empirical research, people can improve their storage capacity or the ability to solve complex problems through studying important subjects.
In conclusion, I firmly concur that because food preparation or food science and essential knowledge are of equal measures. For that reason, a logical and moderate division of time into these kinds of subjects is necessary to help a learner develop fully.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- AGREE OR DISAGREE CHILDREN SHOULD LEARN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE LIKE ENGLISH EARLY 53
- Some people think that children should bring their phones to school Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- AGREE OR DISAGREE CHILDREN SHOULD LEARN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE LIKE ENGLISH EARLY 76
- The graph below shows information about the activities that New Zealand and Austalian children ẹnjoy doing the most in 2007. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will further elaborate in this essay. Firstly, it is common knowledge that the...
^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to core'
Suggestion: to core
...ication of time and efforts to learning core subjects such as Math or Information Te...
^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essary to help a learner develop fully.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54375 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96536649295 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63125 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0577437402 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245467056147 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749634875024 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606161620237 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14431462786 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606609271726 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.